kWattWorks helps project teams understand, manage, and optimize the energy required to get work done. By comparing power architectures and operating scenarios, we improve reliability, reduce operational risk, lower fuel use, and control energy costs.
Rather than starting with the equipment, we start with the work being performed and the outcomes that matter to the project. The cheapest equipment is often the most expensive solution. Modelling is how you tell them apart, before anything lands on site.
Energy demand, operating schedules, peak loads, and equipment utilization, built into an accurate picture of how power is actually used on site.
Generator, battery, grid, solar, and hybrid options compared on cost, fuel, reliability, and performance before equipment is on site.
Capacity sized around the work being performed — energy demand, runtime, and charging opportunities, not just the equipment being powered.
Site demand and operating requirements assessed to find the right capacity, reducing unnecessary fuel use, runtime, and operating cost.
Load profiles, operating schedules, and equipment assumptions turned into a consumption estimate teams can plan and budget against.
Available utility power evaluated as part of the overall strategy, to cut fuel use, lower operating cost, and improve system performance.
Power strategies compared on the true cost of delivered energy, for a clearer picture of efficiency and long-term value.
The lowest upfront cost is rarely the lowest project cost. Options compared across the life of the project, not the length of the quote.
Every Model engagement produces the same set of numbers, so one project can be compared against the next.
Every figure kWattWorks puts in front of a client comes out of one system. It profiles the load from the real equipment schedule, prices the power architectures against each other — diesel only, diesel and battery, grid and battery, grid alone — and holds the model against what the site actually did.
TRY A PIECE OF IT · FREE, NO SIGN-UPGenerator Fuel Cost WheelOPEN THE WHEEL →
Equipment gets chosen on price and availability. What it costs to run gets discovered later — unless somebody models it first.
Model engagements are typically a fixed project fee. Integrate engagements usually tie part of the fee to verified savings rather than billing it all upfront. Either way, you’ll know what the opportunity looks like before committing to a larger change.
Yes — a Model engagement can stand alone. Many clients stop there because the numbers themselves are the useful part, whether they act on them with us or not.
Suppliers model around the equipment they provide, and GCs are focused on building the job, not owning the power strategy. kWattWorks sits in the gap: independent enough to compare options, practical enough to make the chosen solution work on site.
A model is only useful if the assumptions behind it are visible. Every figure is traceable to a load, a schedule, or a rate — so when the project changes, the model is re-run rather than re-argued. That baseline is what Integrate builds against, and what Verify measures.
